The relationship between healthcare Cost And Quality
In a paper of 500-1,000 words, describe the relationship between health care cost and quality analysis. Address the following:
- Select one public agency and one private agency and differentiate their roles and major activities in addressing cost and quality in health care. See Topic 4 readings for sources regarding health care agencies.
- Analyze current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Describe any unintended consequences.
- Synthesize implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality.
Cost and Quality Analysis
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% | 3 Satisfactory 88.00% | 4 Good 92.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
| 75.0 %Content | ||||||
| 10.0 %Describe the relationship between health care cost and quality. | Does not describe the relationship between health care cost and quality. | Describes issues related to health care cost and health care quality, but does not discuss the relationship between the two. | Describes the relationship between health care cost and quality, but is insufficiently developed. | Adequately describes the relationship between health care cost and quality. There are few inconsistencies. Few examples given. | Fully describes the relationship between health care cost and quality with no inconsistencies. Clear examples given. | |
| 20.0 %Differentiate the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in healthcare. | Does not discuss the roles and major activities of public or private agencies in addressing cost and quality in health care. | Discusses either the roles or the major activities of one public and one private agency in cost and quality in health care, but not both. | Discusses, but does not differentiate the roles and major activities of one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care. | Differentiates the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care, but is insufficiently developed. Minimal use of examples, supporting details, or references. | Clearly and systematically differentiates the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care utilizing references, examples, and supporting details. | |
| 20.0 %Analyze current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Describe any unintended consequences. | Does not discuss current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Does not describe any unintended consequences. | Discusses either current or projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs, but not both. Does not describe unintended consequences. | Discusses current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Does not describe any unintended consequences. | Partially analyzes current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Minimally describes unintended consequences. | Comprehensively analyzes current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Fully describes unintended consequences. Clear examples given. | |
| 20.0 %Synthesize implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality. | Does not address any implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, or evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality. | Discusses implications for either staff nurses or advanced practice nurses relative to cost and quality, but not both. Does not consistently address evidence-based practice. | Discusses implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses relative to cost and quality. Briefly addresses evidence-based practice. No examples given. | Synthesizes implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality; insufficiently developed. Provides examples, but some inconsistencies present. | Comprehensively synthesizes implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality. Clear examples given with no inconsistencies. | |
| 5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Style | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are used as appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The writer has been careful to use paragraph and transition construction to guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. Individually and collectively, paragraphs are coherent and cohesive ? they ?sparkle.? | |
Cost and Quality Analysis
Student’s Name
University
Course
Professor
Date
Cost and Quality Analysis
The Relationship Between Healthcare Cost and Quality
“Balancing cost and quality is a perpetual challenge for businesses, but through careful analysis, it is possible to optimize both for long-term success.” Cost and quality analysis is essential for businesses seeking to maximize profits and maintain customer satisfaction (Pakurár et al., 2019). By analyzing the cost of producing goods and services against their quality, businesses can identify areas where they can reduce costs without compromising quality. Additionally, they can identify areas where quality can be improved to attract more customers and increase revenue. Through cost and quality analysis, businesses can make informed decisions on pricing, sourcing materials, and production processes to ensure profitability while delivering high-quality products or services (Javaid et al., 2021). Therefore, businesses must conduct regular cost and quality analyses to remain competitive in their respective markets.
The relationship between healthcare cost and quality has been debated for years. The common perception is that higher healthcare costs equate to a higher care rate. However, research shows this is not always true (Wood et al., 2018). There are many instances where higher costs do not lead to better outcomes. For example, some higher-priced hospitals have lower quality scores than those with lower prices. Ultimately, the key to achieving high-quality healthcare at a reasonable cost is finding the right balance between cost and quality while ensuring patients receive the care they need. By implementing evidence-based practices, investing in preventative maintenance, and streamlining healthcare delivery systems, healthcare providers can offer high-quality care that is both effective and affordable. This paper will explore the public and private agency roles in addressing cost and quality, that is, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and insurance companies, respectively, current and projected initiatives to improve quality while controlling costs, and finally, look at the implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses.
Public and Private Agency Roles in Addressing Cost and Quality
Public and private healthcare agencies are two distinct organizations that play a critical role in providing healthcare services to people worldwide. Public healthcare agencies are typically funded and operated by the government, and their primary objective is to provide affordable and accessible healthcare services to everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic status (Fainman & Kucukyazici, 2020). In contrast, private healthcare agencies are run by private individuals or organizations and often require patients to pay for their services (Feng et al., 2020). Despite their differences, public and private healthcare agencies aim to improve individuals’ and communities’ overall health and wellbeing. While public healthcare agencies focus on providing care to those who may not afford it, private healthcare agencies often offer more specialized and personalized care for those who can pay for it (Watt et al., 2019). Ultimately, the availability and quality of healthcare services depend on a complex interplay between public and private healthcare agencies, as both types of organizations have a critical role to play in meeting the healthcare needs of individuals and communities.
Differentiation of the Roles and Major Activities in Addressing Cost and Quality between Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Healthcare Insurance Companies.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and healthcare insurance companies are two entities that play critical roles in the US healthcare system. While both aim to improve patient outcomes by addressing cost and quality, their functions and significant activities differ significantly. CMS is a federal agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid, two government-sponsored insurance programs providing coverage to over 130 million Americans (Wolitz, 2019). CMS is responsible for ensuring these programs offer high-quality care at a reasonable cost. CMS engages in various activities to achieve this goal, such as developing and enforcing regulations, setting payment rates, and promoting evidence-based practices (Gaur et al., 2022). CMS also works with healthcare providers and other stakeholders to improve care coordination, reduce healthcare disparities, and promote value-based care. On the other hand, healthcare insurance companies are private entities that provide insurance coverage to individuals and employers (Dickman et al., 2017). These companies negotiate contracts with healthcare providers and set premiums and deductibles for their members. Insurance companies often use various strategies to control costs, such as network restrictions, prior authorization requirements, and utilization management programs. Insurance companies also engage in quality improvement activities, such as monitoring clinical outcomes, promoting preventive care, and providing disease management programs.
One significant difference between CMS and insurance companies is the scope of their authority. While CMS has broad regulatory authority over Medicare and Medicaid, insurance companies are subject to state regulations and must comply with federal laws such as the Affordable Care Act (Guerrini et al., 2020). Additionally, CMS is focused on the needs of vulnerable populations, such as low-income individuals and people with disabilities, while insurance companies aim to provide coverage to a broad range of individuals. CMS and healthcare insurance companies are critical in addressing cost and quality in the US healthcare system (Srivastav et al., 2017). While their roles overlap in some areas, their principal activities and scope of authority differ significantly. CMS focuses on ensuring high-quality care for vulnerable populations, while insurance companies seek to provide broad coverage to their members while controlling costs.
Current and Projected Initiatives to Improve Quality While Controlling Costs
Current Initiatives to Improve Quality
In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on improving the quality of products, services, and processes across various industries. This has led to the development of multiple initiatives aimed at enhancing quality in different sectors. One such initiative is Total Quality Management (TQM), a comprehensive approach to quality management that involves continuous improvement in all areas of an organization (Nasim et al., 2020). TQM involves all employees in the organization and emphasizes customer satisfaction, employee empowerment, and continuous improvement. Another initiative that is gaining popularity is Lean Six Sigma, which combines the principles of Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma to eliminate waste and reduce defects in processes (Honda et al., 2018). This methodology involves a rigorous data-driven approach to problem-solving and focuses on delivering value to customers.
There has been a significant push towards improving quality in the healthcare industry through initiatives such as the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) and electronic health records (EHRs) to improve patient outcomes. NPSGs aims to improve patient safety and prevent errors in healthcare by providing healthcare organizations with specific goals to focus on (Patel et al., 2021). EHRs, on the other hand, provides healthcare providers with timely access to patient information, which can help improve the quality of care delivered. In the food industry, initiatives such as Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) are used to ensure food safety and quality (Gordon, 2017). HACCP is a systematic approach to identifying and controlling potential hazards in food production, while GMPs are guidelines that specify what practices are necessary to ensure food is produced safely and consistently. Overall, these initiatives demonstrate the importance of continuous improvement and the role that quality plays in the success of organizations. Organizations can improve customer satisfaction, increase efficiency, and ultimately achieve long-term success by implementing these initiatives.
Projected Initiatives to Control Costs
Projected initiatives to control costs refer to the strategies and actions organizations plan to implement to manage expenses and optimize efficiency. These initiatives are typically driven by the need to stay competitive, improve profitability, and maintain financial stability. One of the most common initiatives is the implementation of cost-cutting measures (Ogbonnaya et al., 2020). This can involve reducing non-essential expenses such as travel, entertainment, and office supplies. It can also include streamlining processes and procedures to eliminate redundancy and waste and optimizing the use of technology to reduce manual labour and improve productivity. Another initiative is to focus on cost containment (Ranieri et al., 2019). This involves controlling expenses by negotiating better deals with suppliers and vendors, implementing strict budget controls, and reducing inventory levels to minimize carrying costs. In addition to cost-cutting and cost-containment measures, organizations may also look to improve revenue generation (Barbhuiya & Chatterjee, 2022). This can involve exploring new markets, developing new products or services, and improving marketing and sales. Organizations can offset some expenses by increasing revenue and improving their bottom line. Finally, organizations may also focus on improving operational efficiency (Kramer & Kramer, 2020). This can involve optimizing supply chain management, improving logistics, and reducing cycle times. Organizations can reduce waste and improve productivity by improving operational efficiency, leading to significant cost savings over time. Projected initiatives to control costs involve a range of strategies and actions designed to manage expenses and improve efficiency. Organizations can achieve financial stability and remain competitive in their respective markets by implementing cost-cutting measures, focusing on cost containment, revenue generation, and operational efficiency.
Analysis of Unintended Consequences
The current and projected initiative to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs in healthcare has the potential to lead to unintended consequences. One of the unintended consequences of this initiative is that it could reduce the availability of healthcare services for specific populations (Agarwal et al., 2020). Providers seeking to reduce costs may be forced to limit their services or reduce their staff, leading to wait longer times and reduced access to care, particularly in underserved communities. Another unintended consequence of this initiative is that it could focus on short-term cost savings at the expense of long-term health outcomes (Noto et al., 2020). Providers may be incentivized to provide less costly treatments, even if they are less effective, to save money in the short term. In the long run, this could result in patients receiving suboptimal care and experiencing worse health outcomes.
Furthermore, the initiative could increase emphasis on measuring and reporting healthcare quality, creating unintended consequences. Providers may focus more on meeting performance metrics and less on providing individualized care to patients (Kilbourne et al., 2018). Additionally, there may be a risk of “gaming the system” as providers seek to meet quality metrics by prioritizing certain types of patients or treatments over others. Lastly, the initiative to improve quality while controlling costs could lead to a shift towards value-based care, which could have unintended consequences (Slater et al., 2022). While value-based care aims to align financial incentives with patient outcomes, there is a risk that it could result in patients receiving less respect than they need to save costs. Additionally, the shift towards value-based care could result in reduced funding for certain types of care, such as palliative care, which may not have the same measurable outcomes as other types of care. During the initiative to improve quality while controlling costs in healthcare has the potential to produce positive results, it is essential to consider the unintended consequences that may arise. Providers and policymakers must carefully consider the potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate them to ensure patients receive high-quality, accessible, and affordable healthcare.
Implications for Staff Nurses and Advanced Practice Nurses
The healthcare industry is constantly evolving, and nurses at all levels of practice play a critical role in improving patient outcomes and optimizing the use of resources. Evidence-based practice and cost and quality considerations are two areas of particular importance for nurses (Klingbeil & Gibson, 2018). For staff nurses, evidence-based practice is essential for providing high-quality patient care. Evidence-based practice uses the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide decision-making (Johnston et al., 2019). Staff nurses can provide effective and efficient care by staying up-to-date with the latest research and best practices. This can help improve patient outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce healthcare costs. In addition, staff nurses must also be aware of the cost and quality implications of their decisions (Molina Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2019). This involves understanding the costs of different treatments and interventions and the potential impact on patient outcomes. By considering both price and quality, staff nurses can help ensure that resources are used most effectively and efficiently while still providing high-quality care.
For advanced practice nurses, the implications of evidence-based practice and cost and quality considerations are even more significant. Advanced practice nurses have a broader scope of practice and are often responsible for making complex clinical decisions (Boeykens & Van Hecke, 2019). This requires a deep understanding of the latest research and best practices and the ability to evaluate evidence and apply it to patient care critically. Advanced practice nurses must also consider their decisions’ cost and quality implications (Delaney, 2018). They may manage patient care across multiple settings and coordinate with other healthcare professionals to ensure resources are used effectively. This involves understanding the costs of different interventions and treatments and the potential impact on patient outcomes. Evidence-based practice and cost and quality considerations are essential for nurses at all levels of practice. By staying up-to-date with the latest research and best practices and considering both cost and quality, nurses can help improve patient outcomes and optimize the use of resources. This requires ongoing education, training, and a commitment to lifelong learning and professional development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the relationship between healthcare cost and quality is complex and multifaceted. Public and private healthcare agencies play crucial roles in addressing price and quality in healthcare. While public agencies focus on providing healthcare services to the underserved population and ensuring affordability, private agencies aim at maximizing profits while delivering quality care. Various initiatives have been implemented to improve quality while controlling costs, including value-based care, accountable care organizations, and pay-for-performance models. However, unintended consequences such as increased bureaucracy and decreased patient satisfaction have been reported. Staff nurses and advanced practice nurses can play a critical role in promoting evidence-based practice and reducing healthcare costs while improving quality. By providing cost-effective and efficient care, nurses can contribute to healthcare organizations’ success in meeting their patients’ needs.
References
Agarwal, R., Liao, J. M., Gupta, A., & Navathe, A. S. (2020). The Impact of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review: A systematic review of the impact on spending, utilization, and quality outcomes from three Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services bundled payment programs. Health Affairs, 39(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00784
Barbhuiya, M. R., & Chatterjee, D. (2022). Just Survive or Thrive? Effect of Psychological and Organizational Resilience on Adoption of Innovative Strategies by Hospitality Sector Post Covid-19. Tourism Planning & Development, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2022.2121312
Boeykens, K., & Van Hecke, A. (2018). Advanced practice nursing: Nutrition Nurse Specialist role and function. Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 26, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.04.011
Delaney, L. J. (2018). Patient-centred care as an approach to improving health care in Australia. Collegian, 25(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.02.005
Dickman, S. L., Himmelstein, D. U., & Woolhandler, S. (2017). Inequality and the health-care system in the USA. The Lancet, 389(10077), 1431-1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30398-7
Fainman, E. Z., & Kucukyazici, B. (2020). Design of financial incentives and payment schemes in healthcare systems: A review. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100901
Feng, Z., Glinskaya, E., Chen, H., Gong, S., Qiu, Y., Xu, J., & Yip, W. (2020). Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. The Lancet, 396(10259), 1362-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32136-X
Gaur, S., Kumar, R., Gillespie, S. M., & Jump, R. L. (2022). Integrating principles of safety culture and just culture into nursing homes: lessons from the pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 23(2), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.017
Gordon, A. (2017). Introduction: effective implementation of food safety and quality systems: prerequisites and other considerations. In Food Safety and Quality Systems in Developing Countries (pp. 1-19). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801226-0.00001-3
Guerrini, C. J., Wagner, J. K., Nelson, S. C., Javitt, G. H., & McGuire, A. L. (2020). Who is on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genetics in Medicine, 22(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0627-6
Honda, A. C., Bernardo, V. Z., Gerolamo, M. C., & Davis, M. M. (2018). How lean six sigma principles improve hospital performance. Quality Management Journal, 25(2), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2018.1436349
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International, 2, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100109
Johnston, B. C., Seivenpiper, J. L., Vernooij, R. W., de Souza, R. J., Jenkins, D. J., Zeraatkar, D., … & Guyatt, G. H. (2019). The philosophy of evidence-based principles and practice in nutrition. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 3(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.005
Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth‐Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective. World psychiatry, 17(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20482
Klingbeil, C., & Gibson, C. (2018). The teach back project: a system-wide evidence based practice implementation. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 42, 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.06.002
Kramer, A., & Kramer, K. Z. (2020). The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of vocational behavior, 119, 103442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442
Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835
Nasim, K., Sikander, A., & Tian, X. (2020). Twenty years of research on total quality management in Higher Education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12227
Noto, G., Belardi, P., & Vainieri, M. (2020). Unintended consequences of expenditure targets on resource allocation in health systems. Health Policy, 124(4), 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.012
Ogbonnaya, C., Dhir, A., Maxwell-Cole, A., & Gorny, T. (2022). Cost-cutting actions, employment relations and workplace grievances: Lessons from the 2008 financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 152, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.055
Pakurár, M., Haddad, H., Nagy, J., Popp, J., & Oláh, J. (2019). The service quality dimensions that affect customer satisfaction in the Jordanian banking sector. Sustainability, 11(4), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041113
Patel, J., Otto, E., Taylor, J. S., Mostow, E. N., Vidimos, A., Lucas, J., … & Kaw, U. (2021). Patient safety in dermatology: a ten-year update. Dermatology Online Journal, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.5070/D3273052763
Ranieri, L., Digiesi, S., Silvestri, B., & Roccotelli, M. (2018). A review of last mile logistics innovations in an externalities cost reduction vision. Sustainability, 10(3), 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030782
Slater, B. J., Collings, A., Corvin, C., & Kandel, J. J. (2022). Value-based surgery physician compensation model–review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.01.009
Srivastav, A., Fairbrother, G., & Simpson, L. A. (2017). Addressing adverse childhood experiences through the Affordable Care Act: Promising advances and missed opportunities. Academic Pediatrics, 17(7), S136-S143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.007
Watt, R. G., Daly, B., Allison, P., Macpherson, L. M., Venturelli, R., Listl, S., … & Benzian, H. (2019). Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. The Lancet, 394(10194), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31133-X
Wolitz, R. E. (2019). The Pay-Twice Critique, Government Funding, and Reasonable Pricing Clauses: Georgia State University, College of Law Journal of Legal Medicine Symposium. Journal of Legal Medicine, 39(2), 177-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2019.1648942
Wood, E., Harsant, A., Dallimer, M., Cronin de Chavez, A., McEachan, R. R., & Hassall, C. (2018). Not all green space is created equal: Biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320
If you are having challenges with writing your nursing essay either because of lack of time or not knowing where to start, you can order your paper here