Healthcare financing and service delivery systems

As future leaders in the nursing profession, it is critical that you understand the scope and role of policy and finance in relation to individual and population outcomes. For this discussion, consider the following: Where can you find current trends in health policy and financial considerations as they apply to healthcare in general? To your area specifically?(DENVER COLORADO) 

1. Analyze the relationship between legislative processes and their impact on healthcare financing and service delivery systems.
2. Analyze how financial reimbursement affects quality of care, and conversely, how quality of care affects financial reimbursement.
3. Analyze the roles individual nurses and professional organizations play in influencing health policy.
4. Be sure to support your discussion with references to the literature as appropriate

 

 

 

Health Policy and Financial Considerations

 

 

 

Student’s Name

University

Course

Professor

Date

 

 

Health Policy and Financial Considerations

Healthcare Financing and Service Delivery Systems

Healthcare is a fundamental human right, but as the cost of medical services continues to rise, it has become increasingly clear that financial considerations play a crucial role in shaping health policy. Health policy refers to the set of rules, regulations, and laws that govern the provision and delivery of healthcare services (Feng et al., 2020). It ensures that individuals and communities can access quality healthcare services without financial hardships. Health policy plays a critical role in shaping the healthcare landscape, ensuring that healthcare services are affordable, accessible, and of high quality. Financial considerations are a crucial component of health policy, as they are essential in ensuring that healthcare services are sustainable and cost-effective (Jan et al., 2018). Without proper financial considerations, healthcare systems can become financially unsustainable, resulting in reduced access to healthcare services and decreased quality of care. Therefore, financial considerations play a crucial role in shaping health policy, ensuring that healthcare systems are financially sustainable while providing quality healthcare services to all individuals and communities.

Healthcare financing and service delivery systems are essential components of the healthcare industry. The healthcare financing system refers to how healthcare services are paid for, while the service delivery system involves the organization and provision of healthcare services (Lee & Lee, 2021). Various financing models and service delivery systems are used in different countries worldwide. In the United States, the healthcare financing system is mainly composed of private insurance companies and government-funded programs like Medicare and Medicaid (Galvani et al., 2020). On the other hand, the service delivery system includes various healthcare facilities such as hospitals, clinics, and private practices. Effective healthcare financing and service delivery systems are critical in ensuring individuals have access to quality healthcare services regardless of their financial status or location. This paper will focus on Sources for finding current trends in policy and finance in healthcare in general and in Denver, Colorado, the relationship between legislative processes and their impact on healthcare financing and service delivery systems, how financial reimbursement affects the quality of care, and conversely, how the quality of care affects financial reimbursement, and finally look at the roles individual nurses and professional organizations play in influencing health policy.

Sources for Finding Current Trends in Policy and Finance in Healthcare in General and in Denver, Colorado

Healthcare policy and finance are constantly evolving, with changes frequently happening at the national, state, and local levels. Several sources can be used to stay up to date on the latest trends in policy and finance in healthcare. News media is one of the most prominent sources of information on healthcare policy and finance (Kaplan, 2020). National news outlets such as CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC often cover healthcare issues, while local news outlets like the Denver Post may provide information specific to Denver and Colorado. Additionally, specialized healthcare news outlets such as Healthcare Finance News, Modern Healthcare, and Becker’s Hospital Review can offer more in-depth coverage and analysis of healthcare policy and finance trends. Another source of information on healthcare policy and finance is government websites (Chang et al., 2019). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing all have websites that provide information on current policies and trends in healthcare. These websites often have reports, news releases, and other resources that can help stay current on the latest developments in healthcare policy and finance.

Professional organizations and associations can also be valuable sources of information on healthcare policy and finance trends. For example, the American Hospital Association, the National Association of Health Underwriters, and the Healthcare Financial Management Association provide resources and information for healthcare professionals on policy and finance trends (Counte et al., 2019). Finally, attending conferences and events can be a great way to learn about the latest trends in healthcare policy and finance (Plancher et al., 2020). Many organizations and associations hold conferences and events throughout the year, which can provide opportunities to hear from experts in the field, learn about new policies and regulations, and network with other healthcare professionals. Local events and conferences can be beneficial for learning about trends specific to Denver and Colorado. Staying current on the latest healthcare policy and finance trends requires accessing information from various sources, including news media, government websites, professional organizations and associations, and attending conferences and events. By utilizing these sources, healthcare professionals can stay informed on the latest developments in healthcare policy and finance nationally and in their local areas.

The Relationship between Legislative Processes and their Impact on Healthcare Financing and Service Delivery Systems

The legislative processes in a country play a significant role in shaping healthcare financing and service delivery systems. The legislative bodies can create laws and regulations that govern how healthcare is funded and delivered. These policies directly impact the accessibility, affordability, and quality of healthcare services. Legislative processes impact healthcare financing by creating healthcare policies and regulations (Gostin et al., 2019). For example, implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in the United States has significantly impacted healthcare financing. The ACA mandated that all citizens have health insurance, creating insurance exchanges where people could purchase coverage. This has led to an increase in the number of people with health insurance, which has, in turn, increased the amount of money flowing into the healthcare system.

Legislative processes also impact healthcare service delivery systems by setting standards for the quality of care that must be provided. For example, laws may require hospitals and other healthcare facilities to meet specific criteria for cleanliness, staffing, and equipment (Yuan et al., 2022). These regulations can help to ensure that patients receive high-quality care and are protected from harm. Furthermore, legislative bodies can also allocate funding to specific areas of healthcare that need improvement (Tangcharoensathien et al., 2018). For example, a government may invest in improving rural hospitals’ infrastructure or expanding mental health services. These investments can significantly impact the accessibility and quality of healthcare services for specific populations. The legislative processes greatly influence healthcare financing and service delivery systems. By creating healthcare policies and regulations, legislative bodies can increase the amount of funding flowing into the healthcare system and set standards for the quality of care that must be provided. By allocating funding to specific areas of healthcare, they can also improve the accessibility and quality of care for particular populations. Therefore, it is essential for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential impact of their decisions on the healthcare system and the people who rely on it.

Financial Reimbursement and Quality of Care

The relationship between financial reimbursement and quality of care is complex and multifaceted. Financial reimbursement refers to the amount paid to healthcare providers and institutions for the services they provide to patients (Kazungu et al., 2018). On the other hand, quality of care refers to the degree to which healthcare services meet or exceed the standards of care established by healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies. One way financial reimbursement can affect the quality of care is by incentivizing healthcare providers to provide better care (Waitzberg et al., 2022). When providers are reimbursed at higher rates for delivering higher quality care, they have a financial incentive to focus on improving their care delivery processes and outcomes. This can lead to improvements in the overall quality of care provided. However, the relationship between financial reimbursement and quality of care is not always straightforward. Financial incentives can sometimes lead to overutilizing services, unnecessary procedures, and lower-quality care (Tangcharoensathien et al., 2019). For example, if providers are reimbursed for each service, they may be more likely to order unnecessary tests or procedures to increase revenue. This can result in higher costs for patients and lower quality care overall.

Another factor affecting the relationship between financial reimbursement and quality of care is how reimbursement rates are set. If reimbursement rates are set too low, providers may be unable to deliver high-quality care due to a lack of resources (Myint et al., 2019). This can lead to reduced access to care and lower quality outcomes. On the other hand, if reimbursement rates are set too high, providers may have little incentive to improve their care delivery processes and products, as they are already being paid well for the services they provide. The relationship between financial reimbursement and quality of care is complex and multifaceted (Hartley et al., 2020). While financial incentives can incentivize providers to improve their care delivery processes and outcomes, they can also lead to overutilization of services and lower-quality care. The key to achieving high-quality care while maintaining financial sustainability is ensuring that reimbursement rates are set appropriately and that incentives are aligned with delivering high-quality, patient-centred care.

Analysis of how Financial Reimbursement Affects Quality of Care and how Quality of Care Affects Financial Reimbursement

Financial reimbursement and quality of care are closely intertwined in the healthcare industry. The reimbursement models used by payers, such as insurance companies and government programs, are often tied to the quality of care provided by healthcare providers (Dobrzykowski, 2019). Conversely, the quality of care provided by healthcare providers can also impact their financial reimbursement. Financial reimbursement is crucial in healthcare as it determines how much healthcare providers are paid for their services. The repayment received by healthcare providers is often linked to the quality of care they provide to patients (Kilbourne et al., 2018). For example, some payers offer incentives or bonuses to healthcare providers who meet specific quality benchmarks, such as reducing hospital readmissions or improving patient satisfaction scores. On the other hand, healthcare providers who fail to meet quality standards may face reduced reimbursements or even penalties.

The quality of care provided by healthcare providers can also impact their financial reimbursement in other ways. For instance, poor quality care may result in adverse patient outcomes, leading to increased payer costs and decreased reimbursements for healthcare providers (Lievens et al., 2020). Additionally, poor quality care can damage a healthcare provider’s reputation, leading to reduced patient volume and lower reimbursements. Conversely, quality of care can also impact financial reimbursement positively. Providers delivering high-quality care can attract more patients, increasing revenue and refund. Additionally, payers may be more likely to offer higher reimbursement rates to providers who consistently provide high-quality care. Financial reimbursement and quality of care are closely related in the healthcare industry. Healthcare providers who deliver high-quality care may receive increased financial reimbursement, while those who provide poor-quality care may face decreased restitution or penalties. As such, healthcare providers need to prioritize the quality of care as it benefits patients and impacts their financial sustainability.

The Roles Individual Nurses and Professional Organizations Play in Influencing Health Policy

The Roles Individual Nurses Play in Influencing Health Policy

Nurses play a crucial role in influencing health policy at various levels. At the individual level, nurses are often the first point of contact with patients and families, which provides them with unique insights into the healthcare system’s strengths and weaknesses (Jerofke‐Owen & Dahlman, 2019). As frontline healthcare providers, nurses can identify gaps in healthcare policies and advocate for their patient’s needs. They can also use their expertise and experience to provide evidence-based recommendations for policy changes that can improve patient outcomes. Additionally, nurses can engage in public policy discussions and contribute to shaping the health policy agenda by joining professional organizations, attending policy forums, and contacting their elected representatives (Cato & Costello, 2022). By actively participating in health policy discussions, nurses can significantly impact the healthcare system’s direction, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for individuals and communities.

The Roles Professional Organizations Play in Influencing Health Policy

Professional organizations are critical in influencing health policy by providing policymakers with expert guidance, advocacy, and resources. These organizations, composed of healthcare professionals, researchers, and educators, deeply understand the healthcare system, patient needs, and the latest medical advances. They use this knowledge to shape local, state, and federal policy decisions by testifying before legislative bodies, engaging in public education campaigns, and collaborating with policymakers to develop evidence-based policies (Smith et al., 2020). Professional organizations also work to improve healthcare delivery by developing clinical guidelines and best practices, promoting the adoption of new technologies and treatments, and advancing research in their respective fields. By representing the interests of their members and advocating for patients, professional organizations play a critical role in ensuring that health policy decisions are informed, equitable, and evidence-based.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding health policy and financial considerations is crucial for nurses as future leaders in the healthcare profession. Keeping up with current trends in policy and finance, both at a national and local level, is essential to improve healthcare outcomes for individuals and populations. Legislative processes significantly impact healthcare financing and service delivery systems, and nurses should be knowledgeable about how these processes affect their practice. Financial reimbursement directly impacts the quality of care provided, and nurses must be advocates for improving the quality of care to ensure fair reimbursement. Finally, individual nurses and professional organizations are essential in influencing health policy and advocating for the best interests of patients and the healthcare system.

 

 

 

 

 

References

Cato, D. L., & Costello, D. (2022). Advocacy: from the patient to the profession. Nurse Leader, 20(5), 490-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2022.06.005

Chang, A. Y., Cowling, K., Micah, A. E., Chapin, A., Chen, C. S., Ikilezi, G., … & Qorbani, M. (2019). Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995–2050. The Lancet, 393(10187), 2233-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4

Counte, M. A., Howard, S. W., Chang, L., & Aaronson, W. (2019). Global advances in value-based payment and their implications for global health management education, development, and practice. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00379

Dobrzykowski, D. (2019). Understanding the downstream healthcare supply chain: Unpacking regulatory and industry characteristics. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12195

Feng, Z., Glinskaya, E., Chen, H., Gong, S., Qiu, Y., Xu, J., & Yip, W. (2020). Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. The Lancet, 396(10259), 1362-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32136-X

Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020). Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA. The Lancet, 395(10223), 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33019-3

Gostin, L. O., Monahan, J. T., Kaldor, J., DeBartolo, M., Friedman, E. A., Gottschalk, K., … & Yamin, A. E. (2019). The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development. The lancet, 393(10183), 1857-1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30233-8

Hartley, B. R., Hong, C., & Elowitz, E. (2020). Communication in neurosurgery—the Tower of Babel. World Neurosurgery, 133, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.134

Jan, S., Laba, T. L., Essue, B. M., Gheorghe, A., Muhunthan, J., Engelgau, M., … & Atun, R. (2018). Action to address the household economic burden of non-communicable diseases. The Lancet, 391(10134), 2047-2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30323-4

Jerofke‐Owen, T., & Dahlman, J. (2019). Patients’ perspectives on engaging in their healthcare while hospitalised. Journal of clinical nursing, 28(1-2), 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14639

Kaplan, B. (2020). Revisiting health information technology ethical, legal, and social issues and evaluation: telehealth/telemedicine and COVID-19. International journal of medical informatics, 143, 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104239

Kazungu, J. S., Barasa, E. W., Obadha, M., & Chuma, J. (2018). What characteristics of provider payment mechanisms influence health care providers’ behaviour? A literature review. The International journal of health planning and management, 33(4), e892-e905. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2565

Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth‐Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective. World psychiatry, 17(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20482

Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2021). Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 Era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120712

Lievens, Y., Defourny, N., Corral, J., Gasparotto, C., Grau, C., Borras, J. M., … & Rolles, M. (2020). How public health services pay for radiotherapy in Europe: an ESTRO–HERO analysis of reimbursement. The Lancet Oncology, 21(1), e42-e54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30794-6

Myint, C. Y., Pavlova, M., Thein, K. N. N., & Groot, W. (2019). A systematic review of the health-financing mechanisms in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries and the People’s Republic of China: lessons for the move towards universal health coverage. PloS one, 14(6), e0217278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217278

Plancher, K. D., Shanmugam, J. P., & Petterson, S. C. (2020). The changing face of orthopaedic education: searching for the new reality after COVID-19. Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2(4), e295-e298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.04.007

Smith, Y. M., Cleveland, K. A., Fisher, J., & Kleman, C. (2020). The use of faculty policy teams for advancing policy advocacy and colleagueship. In Nursing Forum (Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 582-588). https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12473

Tangcharoensathien, V., Patcharanarumol, W., Kulthanmanusorn, A., Saengruang, N., & Kosiyaporn, H. (2019). The political economy of UHC reform in Thailand: lessons for low-and middle-income countries. Health Systems & Reform, 5(3), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1630595

Tangcharoensathien, V., Witthayapipopsakul, W., Panichkriangkrai, W., Patcharanarumol, W., & Mills, A. (2018). Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. The Lancet, 391(10126), 1205-1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3

Waitzberg, R., Gerkens, S., Dimova, A., Bryndová, L., Vrangbæk, K., Jervelund, S. S., … & Quentin, W. (2022). Balancing financial incentives during COVID-19: A comparison of provider payment adjustments across 20 countries. Health Policy, 126(5), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.015

Yuan, F., Yao, R., Sadrizadeh, S., Li, B., Cao, G., Zhang, S., … & Short, C. A. (2022). Thermal comfort in hospital buildings–A literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103463

If you are having challenges with writing your nursing essay either because of lack of time or not knowing where to start, you can order your paper here