A Nurse’s Role in the Systems Development Life Cycle

A Nurse’s Role in the Systems Development Life Cycle

Developing and implementing a health information technology system

While the process of developing and implementing a health information technology system may seem overwhelming at first, the systems development life cycle (SDLC) provides organizations with a framework to deliver efficient and effective information systems. Though the SDLC is a common overarching structure for implementing information systems, it is not a one-size-fits-all process. In fact, there are a multitude of approaches that can be used to guide the systems development life cycle. The SDLC approach that is most appropriate for a particular organization will be highly contextual and subject to organization-specific differences. But what exactly is a nurse’s role in the systems development life cycle

This week prompts you to analyze the process of selecting an appropriate health information technology and then evaluate techniques that positively impact the steps of the systems development life cycle in an EHR implementation. You also determine what barriers might occur at each stage and how these could be overcome.




A Nurse’s Role in the Systems Development Life Cycle




Student’s Name








A Nurse’s Role in the Systems Development Life Cycle

Developing and Implementing a Health Information Technology System

Nurses are frequently the unacknowledged heroes of the healthcare field, and their vital role in the system development life cycle cannot be downplayed. A nurse plays a critical role in the systems development life cycle pertaining to designing and executing healthcare technology solutions. In the system development life cycle process, a nurse acts as a significant stakeholder, offering valuable perceptions of the necessities and requirements of patients and healthcare providers (Risling & Risling, 2020). Nurses also engage in the analysis and design stages of the project, offering input on the workflow and procedures that the technology will impact. Throughout the testing and execution stages, nurses can assist in making sure that the technology is friendly to the user and encounters the requirements of the end-users. In addition, nurses can offer valuable feedback on the efficacy of the technology, suggesting any appropriate modifications. Comprehensively, nurses play a vital role in the system development life cycle procedure, ensuring that the technology solution executed in healthcare settings are delineated to enhance patient outcomes and offer better patient care. This paper aims to analyze the process of selecting an appropriate health information technology, evaluate methods that positively affect the system development life cycle steps in an HER execution, and determine barriers that might develop at each stage and how to overcome them.

Examining the Procedure of Selecting an Applicable Health Information Technology

The procedure of selecting an applicable health information technology can be a multiplex and demanding task that requires accurate deliberation of numerous factors. The first tactic in the procedure is to recognize the organization’s and its end-user’s requirements, involving healthcare providers, patients, and administrative staff (Grynne et al., 2021). It may entail conducting a requirement assessment, examining the procedure’s current workflows, and gathering feedback from stakeholders. Once the requirements are recognized, the step to follow is to research and assess available health information technology solutions, addressing those requirements. It may include reviewing product stipulations, features, and abilities, including recognizing factors like cost, ascendable, and vendor support. It is vital to involve end-user in the development process, ensuring that the health information technology solution meets their requirements and is friendly to the user. After assessing and selecting a health information technology solution, the second tactic is to plan for the execution, involving tutoring and support for end-user, data resettling, and system integration (Santos et al., 2018). Lastly, it is essential to observe the efficacy of the health information technology solution perpetually, making appropriate adjustments and ensuring it progresses to meet the organization’s needs and goals. Comprehensively, selecting a nessesally health information technology solution entails a broad and repetitious procedure, requiring proper consideration of the organization’s requirements, end-user, and available technology solutions.

Enhancing Electronic Health Record Execution Through Effectual System Development Life Cycle Approaches

Executing an electronic health record system is a multiplex procedure involving numerous stakeholders and phases. Each phase of the system development life cycle is essential in ensuring the victorious execution of the electronic health record systems. Approaches that emphatically influence the system development life cycle steps can significantly enhance the execution procedure and maximize the opportunities for success. Developing a multidisciplinary project squad is an approach that emphatically influences the planning phase (Ledel Solem et al., 2020). The squad must involve representatives from all departments affected by the electronic health record system, involving nurses, physicians, information technology staff, and administration. This approach ensures that all stakeholders have a voice in the planning stage, providing valuable insights into workflow and procedures. Also, it encourages collaboration and maximizes the likelihood of recognizing possible issues on time. A second approach that emphatically impacts the analysis phase is conducting a thorough assessment of the current system and processes. The evaluation must recognize potential areas of enhancement, ensuring that the electronic health record system meets the organization’s goals and objectives. The evaluation must include reviewing current policies and processes, workflow, and authentication practices. This approach ensures that the new system addresses the organization’s distinctive needs and requirements. Throughout the design phase, including end-user, like nurses, in the design procedure can significantly affect the system’s usability and embracement (Howarth et al., 2020). This approach ensures the system is designed to support the end-user’s workflow, meeting the requirements. It also encourages user adoption and maximizes the likelihood of the system’s victorious execution.

In the execution phase, conducting end-user tutoring and offering continuing support are approaches that emphatically impact the process. Tutoring ensures that end-user comprehend the new system’s functionality and workflows, minimizing errors and maximizing efficiency. Continuing support, like a help desk or user support squad, ensures that end-users have ingress to assistance when required, encouraging user adoption and acceptance. Lastly, throughout the maintenance phase, periodically evaluating the system’s performance and making appropriate updates and enhancements are approaches that emphatically impact the procedure (Cimprich et al., 2019). The approach ensures the system remains updated and meets the organization’s changing requirements, enhancing patient care processes and outcomes. Executing approaches that emphatically impact the system development life cycle phases can significantly enhance the electronic health record execution procedure’s success. Approaches like involving end-user, conducting a thorough evaluation, and offering continuing support can ensure that the electronic health record system aligns with the organization’s distinctive needs, encourage user adoption, and enhance patient care processes and outcomes.

Barriers that Might Occur at Each Stage and Ways of Overcoming Them

The execution of an electronic health record system includes various phases, each of which may have distinctive barriers to affluent execution. Throughout the planning phase, barriers may include resistance to change from staff, complications in recognizing goals and objectives, and lack of adequate resources. To overcome such barriers, it is vital to include staff in the planning procedure, establish clear goals and objectives, to allocate adequate resources to the project (Yazdani & Wells, 2018). Throughout the analysis phase, barriers may include complications in capturing correct data and a lack of comprehension of the existing workflows. Overcoming such barriers would involve including stakeholders in the analysis procedure. During the design phase, barriers may include complications in developing a user-friendly interface and addressing the distinctive needs of different departments or specialties. Overcoming the barriers may involve including end-user in the design procedure, developing personalized workflows and offering sufficient training and support to end-user (Gillam et al., 2022). During the testing phase, barriers may involve technical complications and user resistance, and overcoming such barriers involves staff in the testing process, recognizing and addressing technical issues accordingly, and offering tutoring and support to users. Comprehensively, effectual communication, collaboration, and planning can assist in overcoming the barriers that may develop during each stage of electronic health record execution.


A nurse’s role in the systems development life cycle is vital to the victorious execution of electronic health record systems. Nurses bring a distinctive approach to the system development life cycle procedure and offer valuable insights into the nursing workflow and patient care procedure. Involving nurses in all stages of the system development life cycle, potential issues can be recognized and addressed on time, resulting in a more victorious execution and enhanced patient care processes. By comprehending nurses’ role in the system development life cycle procedure, a healthcare organization can ensure that their electronic health record execution is successful, meeting the organization’s distinctive needs and enhancing patient care procedures and outcomes.














Cimprich, A., Bach, V., Helbig, C., Thorenz, A., Schrijvers, D., Sonnemann, G., … & Berger, M. (2019). Raw material criticality assessment as a complement to environmental life cycle assessment: examining methods for product‐level supply risk assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology23(5), 1226-1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12865

Gillam, J., Davies, N., Aworinde, J., Yorganci, E., Anderson, J. E., & Evans, C. (2022). Implementation of eHealth to support assessment and decision-making for residents with dementia in long-term care: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research24(2), e29837.

Grynne, A., Browall, M., Fristedt, S., Ahlberg, K., & Smith, F. (2021). Integrating perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals, system developers and academics in the co-design of a digital information tool. PloS one16(7), e0253448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253448

Howarth, M., Bhatt, M., Benterud, E., Wolska, A., Minty, E., Choi, K. Y., … & James, M. T. (2020). Development and initial implementation of electronic clinical decision support for recognition and management of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01303-x

Ledel Solem, I. K., Varsi, C., Eide, H., Kristjansdottir, O. B., Børøsund, E., Schreurs, K. M., … & Solberg Nes, L. (2020). A user-centered approach to an evidence-based electronic health pain management intervention for people with chronic pain: design and development of EPIO. Journal of medical Internet research22(1), e15889.

Risling, T. L., & Risling, D. E. (2020). Advancing nursing participation in user-centered design. Journal of Research in Nursing25(3), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120913590

Santos, S. C., Santana, C., & Elhimas, J. M. C. (2018). Critical success factors for ERP implementation in sector public: an analysis based on literature and a real case.

Yazdani, A., & Wells, R. (2018). Barriers for implementation of successful change to prevent musculoskeletal disorders and how to systematically address them. Applied ergonomics73, 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.004

If you are having challenges with writing your nursing essay either because of lack of time or not knowing where to start, you can order your paper here 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *